Chapter 12 QFR Fundamental of Management Essay

1. Describe the difference between chat and good communication. How put up a sender verify that a communication was effective? How basin a murderer verify that a communication was effective? parley is the military operation of transmitting information from iodine person to another. Effective communication is the process of sending a message in such(prenominal) a bureau that the message received is a close meaning as possible to the message intended. To encode and transmitted with appropriate channel. after messages be received it is decoded back into a form that is meaningful for the receiver. 2. What are the similarities and differences of oral and written communication?What kinds of situations expect for the use of oral methods? What situations call for written communication? Oral communication is face to face communion group discussions, teleph unitary calls, and other circumstances in which the spoken intelligence service is used to transmit meaning. scripted commun ication is memos, letters, reports, notes and other circumstances in which the written word is used to transmit meaning. Oral communication or email may be preferred when a message is personal, nonroutine, and brief. Written is best used when it is impersonal, routine and longer.5. Describe the individual and organizational barriers to effective communication. For each barrier, describe one action that a manager could strickle to reduce the problems caused by that barrier. Individual barriers are conflicting or uneven signals, credibility about the subject, reluctance to communicate, poor listening skills, and predispositions about the subjects. brass instrument barriers are semantics, status or power differences, different perceptions, and noise, overload and lyric poem differences. Overcoming individual skills are develop good listening, encourage two way communication, be aware of language and meaning, maintain credibility, be sensitive to receivers and senders perspective.Cha pter 13 QFR2. What are the stages of group get along withment? Do all teams develop through all the stages discussed in this chapter? why or why not? How might the concern of a right team differ from the management of teams that are not yet mature? The stages of group development are (1) formingbringing members together and getting them acquaint (2) stormingdeveloping group identity, structure and leaders, often through conflicts (3) normingaccepting and codifying case structures and behavioral norms and (4) performingmoving beyond group formation to cast down accomplishing the groups purpose.Groups typically move through all the stages in the order given, and groups that try to short cut the group development process will often have unresolved issues that will persistently re-surface. The management of mature teams can focus more on performance than on effective development, which means a focus on tasks, rather than on relationships, structures, and culture. For example, while members of a developing group may want or need to spend date getting to know their fellow members through ice-breaker activities, members of mature groups may resent being forced to spend time on such activities. 4. Identify two examples of internal leaders.Can a person be a imposing and an informal leader at the same time? Examples of informal leaders might include such persons as the most experienced secretary in a charm group, an intelligent and articulate student who serves as a spokesperson for the class, or a neighbor who organizes social events. Formal leadership is conferred by ones position within the organization while informal leadership is granted to individuals who are prize and respected by others.Clearly then, one person can be both a formal and an informal leader. An example would be a tenured professor who has a formal leadership role in his or her department or college and who is admired and respected by students and colleagues, serving as an informal r ole model.