Abortion Should Stay Legal

stillbirth Should Stay Legal By Ariam Abraham Professor m atomic come in 18 Mollinedo English 102 9 December 2011 Abstract The topic of terminateion is sensation of the near controersial of our times. It discusses human interaction where ethics, emotions and law come to rushher. in that location atomic number 18 contrary meridians of work out ins towards stillbirth. These views female genitals be broken d give into deuce categories, Pro-life and Pro- prime(a). Everyone has their own views and opinions despite what several hoi polloi may take, abortion is n any amend nor wrong. A pro-lifer is against abortion.Pro-lifers believe that from the moment of conception, the conceptus is a snappy and this life imposes a incorrupt obligation to preserve it. It has a brain and a heart in that locationfore it in like manner has a businesseousness to life. Religion plays a big role on pro-life. abortion is against the al-Quran and most ghostly peck seizet believe in it either. On the former(a) handa pro- pickaxr would come up that the finding to abort a pregnancy is that of the mothers and the nation has no right to interfere. Abortion is a womensown right hand choice. Women should non be obligate to fix babies they entert fatality or argonnt progress to for.They must(prenominal) be able to decide what happens to them and become a base hit plus legal way of doing so. Women be in control of their own bodies and lives. Legislators deal no right to interfere. Abortion in tot every(prenominal)yows us to eng pay off what we motive for ourselves, and it also helps us to follow family planning. We comport every right to recognise whether we extremity to bring forth an abortion or non. Religious people dont support it entirely since it is their belief and decision they should non armament other people to be like them. It has been proven above that all their arguments were non fully true.The closes why women down abortion s vary. It may be a result of enthrall, fleshly or psychological checker. A choice must motive to be availableto pr fact the birth of uncal lead-for children, to void wrongfulness to the child aswell as to safeguard the ruttish and physical health of women. Abortion is a tough choice and the decisionshould be a personal one, with give away interference of g everywherenment or finicalinterest radicals. Outline I. Abortion is a very controversial yield that has been continually argued over for the past few solar days and probably for most(prenominal) days to come.A. Abortion is the destruction of a foetus or unborn child maculation the child is still in the mothers womb. B. Abortion in the coupled States has been legal in every state since the United States Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, on January 22, 1973 C. thither atomic number 18 two sides to abortion, the pro-life and prochoice. a. Pro-life are people who are against abortion. b. Pro-choice are people w ho support abortion. II. Religion and ism thinking shouldnt affect the law of abortion. A. A foetus is non a person. B.Pro-life people shouldnt push other people to believe their religion. C. The pro-lifes arguments against abortion are provn to be false. a. Women having an abortion founder been decreasing since 1973. III. Abortion playes a big role in most cases. A. A pregnancy from rape is better to be avoided. B. Incest children face a lot of difficulties in cosmos accepted by their society. C. Woman should have an abortion if her pregnancy is uncompitible with her health IV. Abortion has allowed us to choose what we want for ourselves, and it also helps us to follow family planning. A. in the rawlawsthat are being developed call it harder and harder for women todealwith the problems of pregnancies. Abortion is a very controversial subject that has been continually argued over for the past few years and probably for m some(prenominal) years to come. The main controversy is should abortion be legalized? Before we cop to the answer, permits first define the say abortion. According to Tom capitulum Abortion is the international terminology of a pregnancy after conception. It allows women to institutionalize an end to their pregnancies, but involves eliminateing the undeveloped embryo or foetus (1).This destruction of a fetus or unborn child while the child is still in the mothers womb send away be done by almost anyone from the mother herself to even to abortionist by clinics set up especially for this purpose. Since abortion involves killing a fetus, it is considered as a sensitive subject to discuss, because every person around the humans have a different view and opinion ab come out it. As history tells us Abortion in the United States has been legal in every state since the United States Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, on January 22, 1973 (Lewis 1).Since then, on that point have been many debates among the citizens whether the law i s right or wrong. There are two sides to this abortion topic the pro-life, which are those who are against abortion, and the pro-choice are those who believe it is the fair sexs right to choose if she wants to have an abortion or non. These two groups offer different solutions to a problem. The pro-life solution is to have the child and basically live with it. They believe abortion is non an answer. The pro-choice solution is abortion because of reasons they come up are appropriate.Although abortion is morally and ethically wrong, should it be legal for victims of rape or incest who have no other alternative? To see the Ameri moves view on abortion, a popular TV channel in the United States did a survey on over 1133 people over the age of 18 in 2004. Generally, 57 percent in this ABCNEWS poll film abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 43 percent voted against it. I entrust point out the argumentative reasons for abortion to stay legalized through and through ou t the paper.Many famous and respect people have talked around abortion, likeMother Teresa who was the winner of Nobel apprise for Peace in 1979. She argues, If we accept that a mother displace kill even her own child, how can we tell other people to non kill each other? Any coun try out that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to recognize, but to use any violence to compass what they want (Barbier and Goree 98). Since Mother Teresa was very religious women what she said call sense impression but I totally disagree with what she said. Killing a fetus is not the equivalent as killing a person.The word rack up is very much used by pro-lifers to describe abortion. Murder means bowl over and unsportsmanlikeified killing of another person containing intent. How can anybody see an lousiness intent in a womans decisionto interrupt pregnancy if it is a result of rape or incest? A woman cannotbear the legal opinion of having a child that would be a constant reminder of what had happened on such and such a day, such and such number of years ago. She doesnt want to kill a flub she wants to interrupt the growth of anembryo so that it give not become a cross. She interrupts potential life. exactly if potential life is scarce that, potential.Theres an argument until these days that a fetus is a person that is indistinguishable from the rest of us and that it deserves rights equal to womens. On this question there is a tremendous spectrum of religious, philosophical, scientific, and medical opinion. Its been argued for centuries. Fortunately, our society has recognized that each woman must be able to devil this decision, establish on her own conscience. To impose a law defining a fetus as a person, granting it rights equal to or superior to a womans thinking, feeling, conscious human being is arrogant and absurd.It plainly serves to diminish women. A fetus is like a body dowery in womens body not an individual person and can yet be recognized as a person since the day it is born. It is not registered as a citizen in the governments herald and is not even considered as existing person. So killing a fetus can be called as getting rid of a body part. And, it is not the governments duty to teach the citizens how to love. good deal learn about love from their parents, from their religion and relatives and society. Government cant flesh a law based on how it is deprivation to affect the style of the citizens.It is like we cant have a war because it is not nice to kill people. What if another country attacks us? Are we going to sit and wait until we die? We should protect out country and our selves and the same(p) goes with abortion, we have to protect ourselves if we see harm is coming to us. On the other hand, Abortion is a difficult issue when it is viewed from a religious pointof view. On one hand there is the Commandment against murder, which begsthe question of whether a fetus is a human or not. There is a portray al inthe Bible, which deals specifically with the act of causing woman toabort a pregnancy. In Exodus 2122-25 we read And if men struggle and adopt a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is nofurther injury, he shall be fined as the womans husband may demand of him,and he shall pay as the judges decide. But if there is any further injury,then you shall appoint as a penalization life for life, eye for eye, tooth fortooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, defeatfor bruise( sensitive Revised trite Version, Exodus 2122). In this exit we find a woman losing her child by being stuck by men who are fighting.Rather than it being a capital offense, so far it is looked as a civil matter, with the father to be takingthe participants to tribunal for a settlement. But, as we read on, if thewoman is killed, a life for a life, then the men who killed her shall bekilled. Some have claimed that the life for a life part is talking aboutthe i nfant, but in this passage we also read, Tooth for a tooth. Fetuses/babies do not have teeth when they are born. Thus we can see thatif the baby is lost, it does not require a death sentence it is notconsidered murder. But if the woman is lost, it is considered murder andis penalise by death.I do not want to say that abortion is Biblical, but I reasonable want to show that there can be arguments on both sides and a judgmentagainst people in Gods call off should be stopped. As we have seen above every individual have their own opinion on abortion, depending on their religion and beliefs. If the pro- life group doesnt support abortion they dont have to do it. The law doesnt nip you to have abortion in any case. So people against abortion due to their religions or beliefs shouldnt kvetch against abortion because it is their personal preference. Religious ideology is no foundation for any law.Freedom of religion is guaranteed to any citizen in the United States, so why would the be liefs and determine of one religion mandate actual laws for all citizens? It would be unfair, unjust andimmoral. We do not have laws against eating fish, nor do we have laws that declare it is legal to sell ones daughter, rape someone, or bread and butter a person as slave -all things that are promoted in religious text. There are also few pro-life people that claim women are using abortion as a birth control. By that they mean women are going to be irresponsible and forget have unprotected sex since abortion is legal.This is proven to be untrue by Ms Heather Boonstra. She is a Senior Public Policy connect in the Guttmacher Institutes Washington, DC. On the article Abortion in Womens Lives that she published in 2006 she states, from time to time the number of women having abortion is decreasing (3). here(predicate) is here summarized graph. pic As we can see in the graph the number of women having abortion has been going down since 1981, which proves that women are using abor tion in special cases not as birth control. Other than that, abortion plays a big role in some special cases.We dont hear it that very much but there is informal intercourse surrounded by two people called incest. In definition Incest is versed intercourse between close relatives that is vicious in the jurisdiction where it takes place and is conventionally considered a taboo. The term may apply to sexual activities between individuals of close production line relationship members of the same household step relatives related to by borrowing or marriage and members of the same clan or lineage (Stritof). compensate though it is between families it can be taken as sexual harassment if it is between an adult and an under age.It is not accepted in out society. People consider it as the nastiest thing that human being would do. If by any chance someone becomes a victim of incest, their family and friends impart isolate them for their rest of their lives. Likewise, when a girl i s assail, she feels dreadful. The trauma of being raped could break her down and make her depressed and that is only the beginning. After she gets raped, in her own eyes, she has no respect or self-esteem for herself and then comes the perplexity. Her written report in the society will be damaged permanently and everyone will look down upon her. withal her own familys reputation will be tainted. If she is pressure to carry an unwanted pregnancy, the result is unwanted children. After the unwanted baby is born, the childhood that he will get will not be the best one because of how it was originated. At home, the raped woman would not be a good mother and would be cruel to the baby. Therefore, because of this abnormal event of childhood, when the child grows up and becomes a teenager, he will often crop to crime and be involved in gangs and drugs. For utilization, 40% of African-American kids grow up by a single mother due to ad hoc sex or poverty.And 20% of those kids drop ou t in centerfield condition (Hanson 141). Once a kid stops going to school he or she have a high chance of doing illegal things in order to get money. They are among societys most tragic cases, often uncared-for, unloved, brutalized, and abandoned. Those children have a very strong chance of getting loss or getting arrested or in a worse case scenario, be killed. on the whole this could be restrained if the mother was allowed to get an abortion onwardshand(predicate) on and she would not have to face all the shame and embarrassment for herself and her family. This is not good for children, for families, or for the country.Children need love and families who want and will care for them. Therefore, women who are raped or victims of incest should not be pressure to carry out a pregnancy. Odds are that 1 in 3 women will be victims of sexual violence in her liveliness (Mahkorn and Dolan182). Does that mean that 33% of all women should be forced to carry out a pregnancy from this violation? Those people always dont tell that they have been in that situation until the woman becomes pregnant and all her relatives find out. The baby they have is going to go through a lot since he is born between two family members.Isolation, bulling, and it is most workable that he will involve in illegal medicines or drags just to put himself in the mood since he is most of the time unhappy. These are few of the bad things the child will face, as he got older. This ugly baby will have a lot of problems just because of his parents make a mistake. Why would their child take the punishment for what his parents did? Abortion is the only choice here. Many would argue that these women could endure the pregnancy, spending nearly a year of her life simply re-living the rape and its effects over and over again, to give up a baby at the end of it for bridal.However, we all are aware of the circumstance that there are millions of unwanted children awaiting adoption as we speak who re main unclaimed in fact, UNICEF estimates that there are 210 million orphans in the world right now. If they have no one willing to be their parent or guardian, why would another baby have a better chance? In other word abortion will help in decreasing worlds population. Similarly, World health organization posted an interesting article about women and pregnancy saying, Every minute, at least one woman dies from complications related to pregnancy or childbirth that means 529 000 women a year.In addition, for every woman who dies in childbirth, around 20 more suffer injury, infection or disease approximately 10 million women each year (10). It is take a back end that a lot of women die during pregnancy. People against abortion think that a woman must have the baby once she is pregnant, but that is ridiculous. There are many women in a situation that they cant have a baby. Women have to avoid pregnancy if she has some variant of diseases that gets worse with pregnancy, because it c ould affect her health or the babys health.For example a breast cancer women-getting chemotherapy should not get pregnant because she does not know the effect of chemotherapy on the outcome for the fetus. In this case if a women gets pregnant accidentally she should think about her health first and her babys health second, and have an abortion before the fetus gets older. to the highest degree people now agree that if the mothers life is in danger abortionis acceptable. It seems unreasonable to let both die when one can be saved. There are manyother situations in which abortion can be morallyjustified. One thing is obvious.These pregnancies were not planned andthey are unwanted. Children born to these mothers are biologicalaccidents. In my opinion it is sinful to bring innocent and defenselesschildren into the world when theywill not be cared for. All over theglobe these are children starving, being raped, dying, being beaten upbecause theyre unwanted. They suffer abuses from whic h they neverrecover. Medical researchers also show that unwanted children whose mothersrefused an abortion suffer from serious psychological disturbancesthroughout their life (Morgentaler, 52).Another reason why I believe that availability of choice is vital forwomen is that if a woman decides to have an abortion, she will do anything to end her pregnancy. This is the reality. There is no such thing as a one hundred-per cent sound contraceptive which of course results inunwanted pregnancies. From the illegal days we know many ways in whichwomen aborted themselves. Many women would introduce caustic detergentsubstances into themselves,producing major burns of the vaginal wall and systemic poisoning.Others would insert a tablet of potassium, which led toserious lesions. Number of women tried to dislodge their pregnancies byintroducing knitting needles, coat hangers, or other metal or woodyobjects into their uteruses. Some women threw themselves down flights ofstairs, and some pumped air into the uterus by means of a small pump usedto blow up bicycle tires. Illegal abortions were performed by people withno or olive-sizedmedical knowledge, in back rooms, in a non-hygienicenvironment. All this led to tremendous number of deaths but did not stopthe abortions.Anyone who thinks that outlawing abortion makes abortion goaway is a fool. It makes it dangerous and it makes it shameful. Womenwill always get abortions. And if we are truly concerned about human lifeand if this is not just a hollow guideword for us we should make abortion safeand clean functioning instead of trying to make women feel guilty. Additionally, making abortion legal can decrease illegal abortion. permits look. The following chart was used on the floor of the US Senate during the tumultuous debate on abortion in 1981. It was compiled from official U. S. tatistics. As we can see on the graph, abortion was first legalized on 1967 and we can clearly see that after that year the line started to dro p astutely which shows that the death of women due to illegal abortion decreased. Simply, Laws against abortion do not stop abortion they simply make it less safe. The number of women who get abortions does not change when it goes from being legal to illegal, or vice versa. The only thing that changes is more women die. pic Opponents of abortion seem to think that women who choose to haveabortions typically do so thoughtlessly.They do not know that a decisionin itself is already agonizingand a very severe thing for women. Butcan you really understand the issue of abortion unless you have been in thesituation of possibly having one? What some people do not seem tounderstand is that abortion is not an unproblematic way out. This issue concernedwith badness, and if there is badness there is virulence and worseness. Woman herself has to make a decision, on which is which. Many people try toforce their beliefs on others and judge them for their actions. Thesepeople need to judge them selves before they start to judge others.There is a question that should be answered. Should government be involved in personal matters such as abortion? In my opinion government should not interfere with citizens personal problems. Having an abortion is the same as having a kidney surgery. Once a doctor tells you in what condition your kidney is, it is your decision to have a surgery depending on what the doctor said. Even your kidney is in the worst condition you still have a choice to stay without medication. That doesnt consider as a suicide by the law. It also goes the same with abortion.Would you allow the government to tell you if you could have a kidney transplant or a blood transfusion? Of course not, the fact that we even consider, let alone allow, governments to regulate a medical procedure is both illogical and foolish. Depending on your health, your babys health, and your babys future you should have the right to decide weather you want to have an abortion or not. There fore my theory is that people who spend so much time, energy, and money on anti-abortion campaigns should instead spend it on the extraordinary children they say need saving so muchthe ones who are living and parentless.Imagine if all the funds spent on all those billboards and flyers and campaigns were instead either spent adopting or donating to places that are overrun with orphaned children, perhaps some actual credibility would be given to these people who claim to love children so much. Also, there is the fact of the matter of the more than one million homeless youth in America alone. The number one work out for a child being homeless is physical or sexual abuse at home. Perhaps these child-lovers should step in and care for these already-born children as well. If those people really want to stop abortion, they should turn to methods thatdowork.These complicate comprehensive sex education and safe, affordable contraceptives. Unfortunately, as illogical as it sounds, the peo ple who are most against abortion are also often most against these preventative measures. If they truly wanted to reduce the number of abortions that occur, they would treat these methods. Additionally, if the Supreme Court ever declared abortion illegal, only the unforesightful will be adversely affected. The rich will purchase a round-trip ticket to one of the European Countries, have an abortion there and return. The poor, do not have enough sometimes even to ay for the bus bonk to go downtown. The impact of such a law would be disproportionate. This is in fact what happened before 1973 (before Roe), when abortion was illegal. We must learn from history other we are condemned to repeat it. People who oppose abortion do so usually on religious and moral grounds. They can continue with their moral standards, no one is asking them to have an abortion in the event of rape or incest or some other medical reason. We just ask to be let alone. There is nothing more reclusive to a w oman then the right to regulate her own stinkiness and no one has a right to tell her otherwise.Not in U. S. A. not in this land of the free which guarantees individual and constitutional rights? Choice is a constitutional right, the Supreme Court says so. Michael Monahan is the author of non-profit organization called the Heritage domicil and in is article Illegal Abortion he says, Id still worry that if you forbid abortion, it will just go back to back-alley but butchery and lots of mothers dying. (1). I totally agree with him, stop abortion will be a totally disaster and we will see more death of women due to illegal abortions.As I mentioned through out the paper, abortion should be the mother and the father choice to do, not the law or the government, because it is important when the mother can have a baby due to health problem, when the baby have no future, when a pregnancy occurs under a circumstances that is not accepted on the society ETC. revolutionarylawsthat are bein g developed make it harder and harder for women todealwith the problems of pregnancies. Iflawswere adapted leaving the choice up to the families of the newly conceived, it would make their lives and their choices a lot easier.My personal belief is that each woman should have a right to decidewhether she wants to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. For reasons ofwomens right to self-determination, fortress of their health,adequatecare of children which are born and in order to prevent child abuse andmental disease, easy access to abortion is a must. Most abortions occurbecause contraception failed, because of a rape or because of a seriousmedical conditionof the mother, which could lead to her death. In thesesituations abortion is often the only way that prevents the birth of anunwanted child or saves a mothers life.We have seen that abortion is really important to the society. It has allowed us to choose what we want for ourselves, and it also helps us to follow family planning. We ha ve every right to choose whether we want to have an abortion or not. Religious people dont support it but since it is their belief and decision they should not force other people to be like them. It has been proven above that all their arguments were not fully true. The reasons why women have abortions vary. It may be a case of rape,physical or psychological condition.A choice must need to be availableto prevent the birth of unwanted children, to avoid damage to the child aswell as to safeguard the emotional and physical health of women. Preservation of life seems to be rather a slogan than a genuine goal of theanti-abortion forces what they really want is control. Control over ourbehavior and power over women. Abortion is a tough choice and the decisionshould be a personal one, without interference of government or specialinterest groups. Losing safe and legal abortion would mean trim back womento childbearing vessels.It would mean turning our backs on thetechnology we have, and i t will also devalue women as independent humanbeings. It would bring more mindless deaths from the illegal and self-induced abortions and more pain for women. Works Cited Barbier, Jean, and Georges Goree. Mother Teresa The hunch forward of Christ. New York Harper Row, 1982. Print. Boonstra, Heather. Key Questions for term as a New Federal Teen Pregnancy bar Initiative is Implemented. inaugural. ed. 13. Washington DC Guttmacher Policy Review, 2010. Print. Hanson T. , McLanahan, S. and Thomson, E. (1996).Double Jeopardy Parental Conflict and Stepfamily Outcomes for Children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(1) 141-154. Print. Head, Tom. What is Abortion? Web. 10 Dec. 2011. Lewis, Jone. Abortion History Web. 10 Dec. 2011. Mahkorn Dolan, Sexual Assault & Pregnancy. InNew Perspectives on Human Abortion,University Publisher of Amer. , 1981, pp. 182-199 Monhan, Michael. Illegal Abortion. Web. Morgentaler, Henry. Abortion and Contraception. 1st ed. Beaufort Books, 1982. Print . Stritof, Bob. Prohibited Marraige. Web. The New Oxford Annotated Bible With the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, New Revised Standard Version.Michael D. Coogan, editor. New York Oxford UP, 2001. Print. WHO. District Planning Tool for Maternal and Newborn health scheme Implementation. 6-13. Print. Bibliography Barbier, Jean, and Georges Goree. Mother Teresa The Love of Christ. New York Harper Row, 1982. Print. Boonstra, Heather. Key Questions for Consideration as a New Federal Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative is Implemented. 1st. ed. 13. Washington DC Guttmacher Policy Review, 2010. Print. CNN Obama Pro-choice, Not Pro-Abortion Ad Video. (2008). 12 Nov. 2011 Hanson T. , McLanahan, S. and Thomson, E. (1996).Double Jeopardy Parental Conflict and Stepfamily Outcomes for Children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(1) 141-154. Print. Head, Tom. What is Abortion? Web. 10 Dec. 2011. Lewis, Jone. Abortion History Web. 10 Dec. 2011. Mahkorn Dolan, Sexual Assault & Pregnancy . InNew Perspectives on Human Abortion,University Publisher of Amer. , 1981. Print. Monhan, Michael. Illegal Abortion. Web. Morgentaler, Henry. Abortion and Contraception. 1st ed. Beaufort Books, 1982. Print. Reagan, L. J. When Abortion was a Crime, Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867-1973.Univ of California Pr, 1999. Print. Sproul, R. C. Abortion, a perspicacious Look at an Emotional Issue. Reformation Trust Publishing, 2010. Print. Stritof, Bob. Prohibited Marraige. Web. 24 November 2011. The New Oxford Annotated Bible With the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, New Revised Standard Version. Michael D. Coogan, editor. New York Oxford UP, 2001. Print. WHO. District Planning Tool for Maternal and Newborn Health Strategy Implementation. 6-13. Print. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Abortion Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 22 July 2004. Web. 10 Aug. 2011