Difficult People Essay -- essays research papers

                    Difficult People Analysis     1.     In the beginning-part plot out(p)(p)line, Pyotr is a prevent youth who strives to balance his financial expenditures to that of the amount of his fathers confused income. The effort to cod fathers pension for Pyotrs schooling creates a serious doubt to the financial trade protection of ein truth member in household. Pyotrs father is a disappointment to the family, his anti-social fashion has subdued the family into a state of fear and panic at the acrid tone of his voice.     In the middle-part plot outline, Pyotr now fantasizes about the possibilitys of leaving the do work and walking the eighty miles North to Moscow. He would establish a strength for impunity to the familys grief of a missing son. Pyotr will be inspired by a sole motivation, the relentless three day walk to Mos cow. The trip will submit a stream of inevit satisfactory consequences as a cause of starvation, frostbite and fatigue, the ability to overcome this torment to the physical gentle small-arms gentlemanner would only better saturate the mental ability for perseverance and ratiocination to reach the destination.      The final logic of plot that must be explained at the end of the story is Pyotrs confrontation with his guilt-ridden, contemptuous father before he leaves for Moscow. The intent to reconcile fathers financial loss is expressed through Pyotrs blarney rhetoric and judgemental approach to his fathers daily attitude at the table. Finally, the room is brilliantly lit, not by the familys ability to regroup--their affections were a bonfire now--but by a single, dazzling beam of sympathy to Pyotr, when his father says "Good-bye...the money is on the lot table."2.     The main conflict of this story is a result of the familys f inancial status. Fathers greed, low income, and Pyotrs frustration are key points to the main conflict. The conflict has plagued Pyotr most, the hallucination of abandoning his family is the main conflict in the story.3.     The nature of conflict is most likely the man vs self "setting". As oppose to a man vs man/machine/nature alternative, man striving ag... ...hers abuse. Pyotr adds depth and perception to the story, he has nothing but contempt for his fathers attitude. Stagnation in a family reinforced to destruct, Pyotr must leave the house.10.     The tone of voice is eqaully balanced between Pyotr and his father. The let has little or nothing to say during a mealtime argument. When Pyotrs mother tells her maintain "(Pyotr)... must have money for the journey" the argument sets place and very soon Pyotrs father is screaming "Take everything...Take it all...Strangle me" The ability to without delay subdue the co nflict by acknowledging the personal fault of sparking the financial flip goes unnoticed. 11.     The dialogue delivers reality to the domestic situation. Pyotr begins "I used to be able to put up with such scenes...but now I have got out of the way of it" Pyotrs father retorts "...Do you know what you cost me, you scoundrel? Ill turn you out" This is the most effective scene in the story because Pyotrs father delivers the threat, his wife and daughter bear witness to the intimidation that is aroused by Pyotrs take up for money.