'Homeland Security Essay\r'

'1. Who should be responsible for protecting the public from online individualism stealing? Why? on that point is no real purpose to this question. Except In my opinion the government should be responsible from protecting the public from online identity theft. I say this because there atomic number 18 definite things that should be monitored. Not the social websites or websites you go into and stand for games. The government should monitor when people go to certain websites such as Bank of America or Wells Fargo. These websites should be monitored (no more such as when you login you can see your username and password no) they should be monitored in a means to where your bank statements can be kept on track from day to day.\r\n2. Should laws be traded to stop it, or should consumers change behavior? Consumers should change their behavior from time to time if needed be. There are laws that have stopped identity operator theft. unitary of which is The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. This law makes it dirty for anyone to distribute or computer code or place it in the stream of commerce. There are many other different laws on Identity theft. Some of which are on a website. 3. What is an detach punishment for identity thieves? Considering the expense and problems associated with the crime, it should be turn to as a on less than a felony offense, regardless of the monetary amount of money or goods involved.\r\n4. Given the international nature of the internet, how should foreign identity thieves be handled? There really is no way to handle foreign identity thieves unless they are caught by the police or government first. If by receive they were to be caught, it should be addressed as a felony offense given the fact that they logged into someone’s personal information, which should account on Substantive callable Process. Which is the right to privacy.\r\n'